Former Uber technologies Inc and Lyft Inc drivers in Austin, Texas, on Thursday accused the ride-hailing corporations of breaking a federal law via all at once halting operations in the metropolis after citizens backed a measure requiring them to fingerprint drivers.
The proceedings filed in federal courtroom in San Francisco, in which the businesses are based, said Uber and Lyft violated a regulation that requires agencies to offer 60 days word to employees before a “mass layoff.”
Uber spokesman Matt Kallman declined to comment. Lyft did no longer reply to a request for comment.
The businesses suspended services in Austin on may additionally nine, two days after citizens voted to preserve the city’s law requiring Uber and Lyft, much like taxi corporations, to conduct fingerprint-primarily based historical past exams in their drivers. about 10,000 Uber and Lyft drivers lost their jobs, Uber stated on the time.
The agencies take into account drivers to be impartial contractors, and Thursday’s complaints are the today’s to claim they’re clearly employees under diverse federal and nation laws because of the degree of control Uber and Lyft exert.
They regarded to be the primary cases towards the agencies delivered under the 1988 employee Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act, which changed into designed to offer employees time to adjust to the loss of employment.
organizations that violate the regulation, which includes an exception for “unforeseeable commercial enterprise situations,” are on the hook for wages and blessings employees could have earned throughout the 60-day be aware period.
The lawsuits said the named plaintiffs, who’re seeking to represent training of Uber and Lyft drivers from Austin, were not able to make up for the loss of earnings.
Drivers across the us of a have sued Uber and Lyft claiming the companies misclassified them as impartial contractors and deprived them of extra time pay, pointers, reimbursements and certain employment protections.
In April, Uber agreed to pay up to $one hundred million to 350,000 drivers in California and Massachusetts to settle claims that it owed them reimbursement for gas and mileage and withheld guidelines.
Lyft has proposed a $27 million agreement of a comparable case related to California drivers. Federal judges in San Francisco ultimate week held hearings to remember each settlements.
The cases in US District court docket for the Northern District of California are Johnston v. Uber technology Inc, No. three:sixteen-cv-03134, and Thornton v. Lyft Inc, No. three:16-cv-03135.